In the last week I have been called a feminist beer blogger,
and a "forgetter"; so ignorant to the work of feminists the world
over and the work they have done, all they have suffered... I certainly don't
feel like either one of those names fits who I am. I work very hard in my life
to promote equality of genders and embrace the differences between people. I
want to believe that the strong role models I have who support me or inspire me
to be a strong and successful person will also help inspire and support my
daughter. I want my daughter to be strong and happy, but so secure in who she
is the world of naysayers and categorizers will tremble at her glance. Maybe
that makes me a feminist? Maybe the fact that I signed up for women and gender
studies as my minor gives me some sort of ability to call myself a feminist? I
really don't think that fits...
Of course on the other hand I do on occasion think of issues without
considering the gender or minority aspect involved; I am able to separate those
issues of equality from other issues on occasion. I am sure some of you have
seen this article which has gone wild from the
Daily
Mail on "The History Girls", if not you should read it. I could
pick apart all of the things which I find wrong with the article (and there are
many) and you could all agree or disagree with what I say. I however want to
discuss the fact that these women have PhD’s, should be addressed as Doctor,
and all of them have extensive knowledge in their field. My issue is not how
they dress, I don’t really think that the clothes you wear should decide how
you are perceived by society, but I understand it does; I also don’t think that
all of these women are dressed up like sexual objects.
No, my issue is the
lack of respect for their intellect, both on the blogs which I read that are condemning
the stylized versions of historians (these
doctors
allowed themselves to be photographed like that), and within the article itself. The questions which are
being asked are AWFUL! But the interrogated makes the best of it that she can.
Why is it okay for society to be up in arms over the way in which a magazine (a
magazine guys, not a journal or a recognized media outlet, a magazine) portrays
the physicality of these women? Shouldn’t the main issue be why are we focused on
what they look like, and not the questions that were asked? Why is this
magazine so sure that it’s audience wants to know a bunch of phony BS like who
would you go back in time to see? Is it because we can’t focus on real issues?
What about women who actually take bullets for their beliefs,
like Malala Yousafzai? I am well
aware of the fact that women the world over cannot get education, cannot get
medical care, cannot vote, cannot drive, cannot earn enough money to support
themselves or their children… to me THAT is what the issue of modern feminism
should be, not what someone who is smart enough to make up her own mind decides
to wear or say. I am not forgetting the past, I am only trying to look forward
to the future because there are millions of women who still don’t have any sort
of equality, and if a puff piece in a UK magazine brings a wider audience to a
field where people can learn empathy and compassion for fellow humans, then is
that so bad?
If you want to know more about women in the beer world, your
first stop should be :
Women Enjoying
Beer
And if you want to learn more about helping women and girls
around the world build a better future:
Because I’m a Girl